FGO’s Most Brutal Verbal Claps—No One Is Safe

2025年3月31日
2025年3月31日
最新情報・攻略テクニック

コメント（6件）

@beneditoneto5811 より:
2025年3月31日 5:09 AM
Lostbelt Liang Yu is just one major hypocrite.
She says that they achieved a wonderful peaceful world but they literally go as far to force people to abandon all their will and if anyone go against it, they just get decimated.
It’s not very different of a totalitarian dictatorship that any type of free will is punished by death, with the excuse of keeping things at bay. They were okay in just annihilating children just for the sake of keep that world going forward and even she herself said her world was built in a mountain of corpses:
Qin Liangyu: “We the people of this empirehad to build this world on their corpses!”
Qin Liangyu: “The peace this land now enjoys was paid for with the blood of soldiers who will never be granted respite in
Mt. Li.”
(LB3 – Battle at Xianyang: Arrow 4)
So yeah, it’s a classic example of “My world is better than yours, even if it’s just as cruel but since it’s my world, it makes automatic better.”
返信
@grapesvine より:
2025年3月31日 5:25 AM
Going by memory, Hans called “Solomon” an idiot when he met him.
返信
@FatedAwakening より:
2025年3月31日 6:11 AM
7:00 Chaldea has the same right to exist as the lostbelts, and only one world can exist. While having to kill the lostbelts is a tragedy, why should the survivors of proper human history have to stand by and let everyone they know and love perish for the sake of allowing one of 7 dead end mostly dystopian worlds to take their place?
And lostbelt 3 is dystopian. Having the improvements to the education system you claim would be a simple “tweak” is completely antithetical to the philosophy presented by their king. Freedom of thought is the enemy. Anything that might produce it is suppressed. It’s justified out of the notion that people living happily in ignorance of what they’re missing is better than people becoming resentful knowing what they could have (and in this case are being denied), but in the first place it’s only justified as better under a moral philosophy that considers human happiness as the only metric worthy of value. What is Qin Shi Huang’s moral argument against humanity living comatose on happiness pills their entire lives, never living an actual life interacting with anyone or accomplishing anything? It’s a future that would be deeply uncomfortable to consider for most people, but QSH would have to endorse it. He wouldn’t, though, because that wouldn’t benefit him, and his moral system is entirely for his own convenience, no matter what he claims.
In any case it’s hard to consider someone a “fair” ruler when they prioritise themselves above all else and immediately attempt to massacre an entire village because someone read a story. The standards for fair aren’t just low, they’re through the floor. Urobuchi seems to have a talent for making audiences oddly uncritical of the monsters he writes.
返信
@user-ii7kt4cz6u より:
2025年3月31日 6:57 AM
Bah, all of this so called claps fall short against the legendary verbal bashing of chad daddy Commander Shepard. Who can drive you to suicide and cause you to kill yourself on the spot but with a mere sentence alone.
The most lethal of all Noble Phantasms.
返信
@lutz7091 より:
2025年3月31日 8:14 AM
9:42 well it took a lot but in the end she found an answer for herself 🙂
返信
@NevisYsbryd より:
2025年3月31日 8:35 AM
Lmao what? Liang Yu was completely full of crap. Her world is not peaceful; they have but completely centralized the violence where the entire species has been turned into dehumanized chattel at the cost of the genocide of every culture and civilization other than the single eternal Emperor occasionally wiping anyone convenient off the map. Their history is no less bloody. Furthermore, this prompt _was_ answered; Jing Ke’s final dialogue was an explicit rejection of the Lostbelt’s entire premise. The entire Lostbelt existed only at the erasure of a pre-existing world; they have absolutely no right to call PHH the aggressor in this context. The Lostbelts were all pruned precisely because they were dead ends, a world that went down the path of some form of meaningless suicide built on irredeemable self-contradictions. She was almost _completely_ wrong here and was using rhetoric as an excuse for her personal interests, not engaging in any sort of good faith argument or deconstruction. QSH was not a good ruler or leased; he was a genocidal despot and his world was categorically long beyond salvation. None of the Lostbelts were ‘evil’; they were dead hypotheticals built on the murder of a real, viable world.
返信